Vegas Lawyer
Helping People Who
Were Hurt In Nevada

Dempsey, Roberts
& Smith, Ltd.
Attorneys-At-Law




Vegas Personal
Injury Lawyer

Nevada Legal Help


Home
Mesothelioma
Slip & Fall
Medical Injury
Product Defect
Other Claims
Articles
Contact Us
















Las Vegas Personal Injury Lawyer

Vegas Injury Law

Las Vegas Inury Lawyer
vegaslawyer.net

  • Different Responses To Ritalin
















  • Different Responses To Ritalin


    Study Reveals Differences in Patients’ Response to Ritalin

    Findings may explain variation in doses needed to treat attention / hyperactivity disorder

    UPTON, NY — A new brain-imaging study offers insight into why individual patients respond differently to standard doses of Ritalin, a drug used to treat millions of children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) each year. The study, conducted at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Brookhaven National Laboratory, appears in the March 1, 2002 issue of the journal Synapse.

    “Methylphenidate [Ritalin] is very effective for the treatment of ADHD,” said Brookhaven psychiatrist Nora Volkow, lead author on the study, “but the doses required to achieve clinical responses vary significantly from patient to patient. This new study suggests that this variation may be due, in part, to individual variation in the release of dopamine, a neurotransmitter associated with feelings of reward and pleasure.”

    Volkow’s group at Brookhaven had previously shown that Ritalin exerts its attention-increasing effects by increasing the amount of dopamine in brain cell synapses, the space between cells (see: "New Brookhaven Lab Study Shows How Ritalin Works"). It does this by blocking dopamine transporters, proteins that normally transport dopamine from the synapse back into dopamine cells, recycling it for future use. More dopamine in the synapse yields a stronger reward signal, and more enjoyment of and motivation to perform certain tasks.

    Volkow hypothesized that variation in response to Ritalin might be due to differences in the drug’s ability to block the transporters in individual patients. To test this hypothesis, the Brookhaven scientists used a technique called positron emission tomography (PET) to measure dopamine transporter blockage and extracellular dopamine in ten healthy adult volunteers before and 60 minutes after being given a standard dose of Ritalin (60 milligrams). Transporter blockage and dopamine levels were measured on different days.

    Transporter blockage was measured by injecting each volunteer with a radioactive label that binds to available, or free, dopamine transporters. The strength of the radioactive signal picked up by the PET camera indicates how many transporters are blocked by Ritalin (the lower the binding of the radiotracer, the higher the blockage by Ritalin).

    Dopamine levels were measured by injecting volunteers with a different radioactive label, one that competes with dopamine in the brain for binding to receptors. In this case, the lower the signal from the radioactive label, the higher the level of dopamine in the synapse.

    The findings: The fixed dose of Ritalin significantly blocked dopamine transporters and significantly increased extracellular dopamine, as expected. However, while the magnitude of the blockade of the dopamine transporters by Ritalin was similar across subjects, the magnitude of the increases in dopamine differed markedly between subjects. As a result, the correlation between Ritalin-induced dopamine transporter blockade and the increase in dopamine levels was not significant. In fact, there were subjects in whom Ritalin blocked significant numbers of dopamine transporters, but did not increase extracellular dopamine. So the level of transporter blockade could not explain the variability in Ritalin-induced changes in dopamine.

    “We interpret this lack of a correlation as an indication that the dopamine increases were due not just to dopamine transporter blockade by Ritalin but to individual variability in the amount of dopamine released by the dopamine cells,” Volkow said. “This means that, for an equivalent level of transporter blockage, Ritalin will induce smaller dopamine changes in a patient with low dopamine cell activity than in one with high dopamine cell activity.”

    “This may explain why some patients do not respond to Ritalin,” Volkow said. Even if the drug effectively blocks dopamine transporters, it may not significantly increase extracellular dopamine if dopamine production is low. This study, one more step in understanding how Ritalin works, may help doctors find other ways to treat patients who do not respond to the drug.

    This work was funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, which supports basic research in a variety of scientific fields, and the National Institute on Drug Abuse, a division of the National Institutes of Health.

    This information came from a BNL online article.

    *** Any medical or legal information can be incorrect or outdated ***
    *** Consult a qualified source for current info ***


    Index | Home

    Contact David Matheny, Esq. for a free consultation.

    (702) 388-1229




    Lawyer Search | Attorney Finder


    Search for more information on Vegas Law and Las Vegas Lawyers:

       




    Las Vegas Legal Help
    Nevada Injury Law


















    Vegas Lawyer
    Vegas Lawyers

    Index | Home

    Find A Lawyer By State | Search For Attorneys By City | Get Legal Information | Contact Us





    DEMPSEY, ROBERTS & SMITH, LTD.
    520 South Fourth Street, Suite 360
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

    Las Vegas Lawyer - Las Vegas Attorney - Las Vegas Personal Injury Lawyer

    Neither the State Bar of Nevada nor any agency of the State Bar has certified any lawyer identified here as a specialist or as an expert.  Anyone considering a lawyer should independently investigate the lawyer's credentials and ability. This site is intended for Nevada residents and those with legal issues arising under the jurisdiction of the State of Nevada.  This site does not give legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship.  Laws are different in other states and localities, consult a local attorney.

    The information in this web site is provided for informational purposes only. The information does not constitute legal advice. The use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship. Further communication with an attorney through the web site and e-mail may not be considered as confidential or privileged. Please contact our attorneys if you wish to discuss the contents of this web site. Any laws, rules or statutes giving any information, restrictions or deadlines, are always subject to change at any time - Contact a local attorney to obtain the current status of such information.

    In the series of Articles on this site, many government PSAs and other information are excerpted. All such materials are believed to be in the public domain. If any work is protected, contact the webmaster at any of the e-mail links and the material will be taken off the site immediately.

    If you experience unusual problems with this site or discover bad links, please email the webmaster. Thank you.

    Copyright: David Matheny, 2003-2005.